Frontend today is not just about the interface but the foundation of the entire user experience. The choice of the right web technology directly affects time-to-market, scalability, and ease of maintenance.
According to Statista, the leaders remain React and Angular, while Blazor, promoted by Microsoft, currently holds less than 5% of the market share. However, popularity does not always mean it’s the best solution for your specific business needs.
Most used web technologies among developers worldwide, 2024
In this article, we will take a closer look at Blazor, React, and Angular, explore the key features of each technology, as well as provide recommendations on what tool to choose to develop web applications for your next project.
Why Do People Compare Blazor, Angular, and React?
People often compare Blazor, Angular, and React because these three technologies compete for the same space.
On the surface, they all allow developers to create dynamic, interactive user interfaces, but the way they do it, the ecosystems they belong to, and the long-term implications of choosing one over the other vary significantly.
Overview of Blazor
Blazor is a modern web framework created by Microsoft that enables developers to build interactive web applications using C# for both server and client logic, which reduces the need to use JavaScript. Its key advantage lies in allowing developers to use the .NET technology stack for both the server and client sides of an application.
Microsoft plays a major role in Blazor’s development, actively developing the framework, releasing regular updates, and supporting the entire .NET ecosystem. For companies, this means confidence that the technology will continually evolve and remain relevant in the long term.
One of Blazor’s standout features is its support for Razor syntax, which makes it possible to embed C# directly into HTML markup. It makes development easier and more natural, especially for teams already experienced in ASP.NET. Over and above that, Blazor also supports both WebAssembly and server-side models, with superb performance and flexibility in developing web applications.
Overview of Angular
Angular is one of the most famous and authoritative web development frameworks created by Google. Its history began in 2010 with AngularJS, and then it was completely redesigned and released as Angular. Since then, the framework has been regularly updated and remains one of the main technologies in front-end development.
Angular is most often used in large corporate projects where stability, scalability and long-term support are critical, such as ERP and CRM systems, as well as platforms with numerous modules and a large user base.
The strengths of Angular include its strongly typed architecture, modularity, built-in testing tools, and a rich ecosystem. These features make the framework highly suitable for large teams and complex projects.
However, its complexity and steep learning curve can be a challenge for smaller teams or startups, where speed of delivery is often more important than having an extensive set of built-in features.
Overview of React
React is likely the most popular technology for building modern web applications, yet it is not a full framework like Angular or Blazor. React is a Meta-developed JavaScript library that exists to build user interfaces through a component-based system.
Its lightweight core makes it highly flexible, allowing developers to choose the additional tools and libraries they need for routing, state management, or data handling.
Despite being “just a library,” React can serve as the backbone of production-ready applications. With the help of frameworks built on top of it (most notably Next.js) React can support server-side rendering (SSR), static site generation (SSG), and improved performance optimizations.
This makes it possible to create applications that are both highly interactive on the client side and optimized for speed and SEO on the server side.
React’s popularity is also reinforced by its huge ecosystem and community support, offering countless third-party libraries, UI components, and development tools. This flexibility makes React a common choice for startups looking to move fast as well as enterprises that need scalable, maintainable solutions.
Comparing Blazor vs Angular
Blazor and Angular both aim to simplify the development of interactive web applications, but they come from very different ecosystems and follow distinct philosophies.
Angular is a comprehensive framework built with TypeScript. It offers everything developers need out of the box, including routing, form handling, dependency injection, and a structured approach to building large applications.
Blazor, in turn, is part of the .NET ecosystem and allows developers to write client-side and server-side code in C#. Instead of relying on JavaScript, Blazor applications can run either on the server through SignalR or directly in the browser using WebAssembly.
One of the main differences lies in the developer experience. Blazor is a natural fit for teams already working with .NET, as it allows them to share code, models, and libraries between the backend and frontend, reducing duplication and easing maintenance.
Angular, by contrast, is more appealing to teams with strong TypeScript and JavaScript expertise, offering a mature ecosystem and a clear, opinionated structure that works especially well for enterprise-scale projects.
When it comes to performance, Angular benefits from years of optimization and a rich ecosystem of tools, though its bundle size can be heavy compared to lighter options.
Blazor Server provides fast initial load times but depends on constant server communication, while Blazor WebAssembly shifts the runtime to the browser, resulting in slower first loads but greater independence once running.
In short, if your main priority is fast delivery using existing .NET expertise, then Blazor is the right choice. But if your team is proficient in JavaScript/TypeScript, Angular might be a more seamless choice.
| Criteria | Blazor | Angular |
| Performance | Strong with WebAssembly, but it may lag in highly complex scenarios. | Well-optimized for large-scale apps, though it can feel “heavy.” |
| Learning Curve | Easier for C#/.NET developers, harder for those coming from JS. | Steep, requires learning TypeScript and architectural patterns. |
| Ecosystem | Young but growing rapidly within the .NET environment. | Mature and extensive, with thousands of libraries and ready-to-use tools. |
| Syntax & Tools | Uses Razor syntax, convenient for ASP.NET developers. | Based on TypeScript, with powerful built-in tools and a robust CLI. |
Blazor vs Angular: Performance, Learning Curve, Ecosystem, and Syntax
Blazor vs React: When to Use Blazor and When to Use React
Blazor and React also take very different approaches to web development, but both aim to deliver rich, interactive user experiences.
From a developer’s perspective (as we mentioned earlier), Blazor is most attractive to teams with strong .NET expertise, as it allows backend and frontend code to be written in the same language and to share business logic.
React, by contrast, appeals to developers familiar with JavaScript or TypeScript and those who value flexibility in choosing their tools.
In terms of performance, React is generally faster to load and render since it uses a virtual DOM and has a much lighter runtime footprint.
Blazor Server can be very responsive once connected, but depends heavily on a constant network connection, while Blazor WebAssembly often has a slower initial load due to downloading the .NET runtime. However, Blazor’s strong integration with .NET backend services can offset these drawbacks in enterprise settings.
Ultimately, the decision between Blazor and React comes down to ecosystem alignment and project goals.
Teams already invested in Microsoft technologies and looking for tight integration with .NET backend services will benefit from Blazor, while teams prioritizing flexibility, faster ramp-up, and access to the largest developer community will usually gravitate toward React.
| Criteria | Blazor | React |
| Popularity & Support | A relatively new technology (around 5% market share), strongly backed by Microsoft. The community is smaller but expanding rapidly. | One of the most widely used tools (nearly 40%), with vast resources and a large developer community. |
| Architecture | Supports both Server-Side and WebAssembly models. Uses C# and .NET for a unified stack. | Component-based architecture in JavaScript/TypeScript, highly modular and flexible. |
| Development Experience | Easier for .NET developers, reduces context switching between languages. | Quick to get started, rich ecosystem, but requires adding extra tools for routing, state management, etc. |
Blazor vs React: Popularity, Architecture, and Development Experience
Angular vs React: Which Technology Is More Suitable?
The comparison of Angular vs React is one of the most common questions when choosing a technology for web development. Both tools dominate the JavaScript ecosystem, but they differ significantly in philosophy and structure.
Again, Angular is a complete, opinionated framework, while React is a flexible UI library that requires assembling additional tools for a full development stack.
This difference makes Angular better suited for teams that prefer a standardized approach with everything built-in, whereas React attracts those who value freedom of choice and customization.
From a development workflow standpoint, Angular enforces strict patterns with modules, services, and dependency injection, which can improve maintainability in large, complex projects.
React, on the other hand, offers a simpler learning curve at the start and allows developers to adopt practices and libraries as needed, though this can lead to more variation between projects.
When it comes to performance, React is often seen as more lightweight and faster to render thanks to its virtual DOM and smaller initial bundle sizes.
Angular provides strong performance as well, but its comprehensive nature means more code is shipped upfront, which can impact load times in smaller applications. That said, Angular’s built-in optimizations and powerful CLI tooling make it easier to manage performance at scale.
| Criteria | Angular | React |
| Architecture | A complete framework includes everything: routing, forms, HTTP, and testing. | A UI library requires third-party tools for routing and state management. |
| Learning Curve | Steeper: requires knowledge of TypeScript, templates, and architecture. | Easier to start with, only basic JavaScript and JSX are needed. |
| Ecosystem | Large and stable, with official updates from Google. | Huge but fragmented, tooling choices are left to the team. |
| Performance | Well-suited for complex enterprise applications with heavy workloads. | Excellent for dynamic, interactive user interfaces. |
Angular vs React: Key Characteristics
Blazor vs React vs Angular: Choosing the Right Solution
We know how difficult it can sometimes be to choose between Blazor, Angular, and React, and to help you decide, we’ve described typical situations where each of these technologies is most suitable.
By and large, Blazor often makes sense for internal business tools and enterprise systems that already run on .NET. Companies that use Microsoft technologies find it easier to adopt, since their developers can stay within the same stack and avoid extra training. It also works well when long-term support is a priority.
Angular is usually chosen for big enterprise projects. Its structured approach, strong TypeScript foundation, and wide range of built-in tools make it a safe option for teams that plan to maintain and grow a system over many years.
React is popular with startups building single-page applications that need rapid growth and SaaS companies. It lets teams move fast, build flexible interfaces, and tap into a huge library of ready-made components. This makes it easier to launch quickly and adapt the product as it grows.
| Criteria | Blazor | Angular | React |
| Popularity | Around 5%, but growing thanks to Microsoft | About 17%, an established enterprise solution | Nearly 40%, one of the market leaders |
| Performance | High (especially with Blazor WebAssembly), but not always stable | Well-optimized for complex projects | Lightweight and fast in dynamic interfaces |
| Learning Curve | Easier for .NET developers, harder for JS teams | Steep, requires learning TypeScript and architecture | Softer, possible to start with basic JavaScript |
| Ecosystem | Young, growing along with .NET | Mature, backed by Google | Huge, but more fragmented |
| Corporate Support | Microsoft, with a long-term strategy | Google, with regular updates | Meta (Facebook), but app development largely depends on community |
| Implementation Cost | Lower for teams with .NET expertise | Higher, requires specialists and complex architecture | Medium, easy to find developers |
| Flexibility | Limited by the .NET ecosystem | Strict rules and standards | Maximum flexibility, many ways to implement |
| Long-term Prospects | Strong within the Microsoft ecosystem | Reliable for enterprise | Maintains leadership thanks to popularity |
Key Metrics of Blazor vs React vs Angular
SCAND Expertise in Blazor, Angular, and React Development
For over 25 years, SCAND has been building software for clients worldwide. If you’re considering a new web development project, we can help you choose between Blazor, Angular, and React.
While it’s possible to make this decision independently, the risk of choosing the wrong path is high: it may result in budget overruns, higher training expenses, or challenges with scalability.
At SCAND, we recommend taking this journey together with our experts. We can help you:
- Analyze your project’s business goals,
- Evaluate your team’s resources and capabilities,
- Determine the scope and long-term growth potential of your product,
- Select the technology that best aligns with your business needs.
This approach allows our clients to avoid unnecessary risks and ensures that the chosen solution supports both fast delivery and long-term stability. And this is exactly where our expertise becomes essential.
Get in touch with us today to discuss your goals and start building the product your business needs.
