Current thoughts on social media


It’s now been a year since The Muskover (Elon Musk’s takeover of
Twitter). Many wondered whether Twitter would still be around by now, or
a technological or financial wreck. Technologically it’s still present,
despite losing a lot of experienced engineers the site is still up and
working, although there’s a sense of unreliability that brings back memories
of the fail-whale days. It hasn’t gone bust either, although there are
regular articles showing not just that Musk vastly overpaid for Twitter, but
also questioning how long its finances can keep going considering the heavy
debt load placed on it.

I won’t try to summarize opinions on what the now-renamed X is like as a
social media experience. On this, like most things, there’s no shortage of
Opinions On The Internet. But I will share my personal view, for those that
might be interested. After all, one more opinion can’t do much harm.

In doing this, I need to explain how I use social media, since people’s
views of the state of social media will naturally vary depending on their
usage pattern. I first started using social media (in some form) in the late
1980’s with Usenet. I learned quickly that I disliked the often-heated
arguments that blew up there, and so I avoided reading them and, above all,
avoided getting into them.

For social media now, the main reason I read it is to know about new
events from people I’m interested in, especially interesting articles.
I avoid any feed that involves the platform
trying to figure out what I might like. Instead I pick selected feeds to
follow and organize them into a handful of lists to read according to my
current context. (eg tech stuff during the day, current affairs and
boardgames in the evening.)

Given that, I see much less of the excrement that many people talk
about on X, and it hasn’t got noticeably worse since the muskover. The
biggest change is that so many of the people I used to follow are no longer
there. There is an upside to this, checking my X feed is now much faster
than it used to be, but at the cost that my awareness of what’s going on
with those folks is a lot less.

I’m seeing a platform diversification. People haven’t gone to one
service, but have split up among many: Mastodon, Bluesky, Threads, LinkedIn,
Instagram…. That makes it harder for me to follow them, since I have to sign
in on a bunch of different places. Some remain on Twitter, but it’s now
feeling like one of several places to go to. I find that annoying as I don’t
want to be checking a dozen social media sites to find people.

Habit means I still check X fairly regularly for those people who
are still there. I started using Mastodon about a year ago, so that allows
me to follow people on the Fediverse. I got a Bluesky account, but haven’t
posted on it yet. It’s handy for a couple of people I like to follow there.
I continue to resist LinkedIn, I wouldn’t mind its posts, but the whole
connections and job recommendations strikes me as a nightmare waiting to
happen. I don’t have Threads since I do most of my social network reading at
my desk and it was originally mobile-only (I’m also hoping it will make good on
its plan to implement ActivityPub). I used to use Facebook for mostly
non-work people, but now whenever I open the app I see more ads than
interesting posts. I never signed up for Instagram (another reason why I
haven’t got around to Threads yet).

That covers my reading activity, what about my writing? As I mentioned
earlier, I learned to avoid discussions or arguments on Usenet, so I don’t
look to post for that. I might rarely comment on someone else’s post, but
then try to follow Charles Miller’s useful rule
and post only once. If someone posts an interesting article, I’ll repost it
if I think my repost will give it more attention.

My main use of posts is to notify people about a new post on
martinfowler.com. My primary way of alerting people about new posts is my
Atom feed, but sadly these feeds aren’t as widely used as they used to be.
(I peruse my Atom/RSS feeds daily, it’s still my favorite way of keeping up
with long-form material.) I got into the habit of posting such announcements
on Twitter a while ago, as my sense was that it had a much bigger reach than
the Atom feed. Certainly I think that posting such announcements were the
reason why I got to over 300,000 followers on Twitter. When the muskover
occurred I also started posting on the Fediverse using Thoughtworks’s
Mastodon instance.

I mentioned earlier that Twitter seems much quieter for me as reader,
since many of the folks I like to follow have left. I would imagine this
means there’s less reason for me to post announcements there too. But it
seems that there’s just as much reaction as there used to be. Here’s the
distribution of the number of retweets for my posts pre and post Musk.

The distributions are similar for likes. It seems reasonable to use these
as proxies for interest in the posts. It may be that bot activity distorts
the figures, but this is the best evidence I can get.

I can also compare retweets between my
Mastodon and X accounts.

Despite its troubles X is still more active than Mastodon, but not as
much as the difference in follower count would suggest. To get a better
sense of their value I should put some attribute cruft in the URLs and
figure out how to track them, but it isn’t really that high on my priority
list.

Some people are critical that I still use X, considering the antics of
its owner. But I think of this from my readers’ perspective – where are they
and how would they like to hear about new material? The numbers above
indicate there’s still enough readership following on X to be worth
announcing there.

There’s also the question of whether I should start posting on the other
platforms too, but then I get worried about the hassle of posting on a
plethora of places. Posting on X, Mastodon, and Atom isn’t too bad, but I
really don’t want it to get worse. So, at least for a while, I’ll stick to
this trio.

The reason I’m posting on Mastodon is because the future I want is one
that’s based on interoperability. I want to see an open protocol that isn’t
dependent on a tech-lord’s whim. ActivityPub is currently the one
that looks most developed. Bluesky’s AT Protocol may become important in the
future, so I’m also keeping an eye on that.

That’s also why I avoided using Medium, Substack, and similar products. I
want to own my words and thus I post on my own domain. I’m fortunate
enough to have a regular employer and some books that sell well, so I don’t
need to monetize my online writing. By using my domain I can be sure that I
can make material available and present it in the way I like.

I post on some small discussion lists using Slack and Discord, both of
which work well for smaller groups. I rather like a group that has a limited
membership. That way I can take into account the context of the group when
posting, which usually makes it easier to post things.


Latest articles

spot_imgspot_img

Related articles

Leave a reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

spot_imgspot_img